Please make it grammatically correct. Also, do not make it sound too intelligent. Do not use Wikipedia or magazines or tabloids as a source.

Juvenile Justice

Order Description

I need an AB on juvenile justice on five articles ; follow these directions:

Annotated Bibliography on [Juvenile Justice]
Source #1 full reference entry – entries should be in alphabetical order and have a hanging indent. I have formatted each one.
Begin your annotation immediately after the entry. Your annotation should be 2 paragraphs in length. The 1st paragraph should summarize the article. Remember the strategy that we practiced in class for scholarly sources – What did the author study, how did she study it and what did she learn?
Your second paragraph should assess the article – from both an objective and subjective perspective. Objectively, discuss its relevance or the author’s credentials when compared to scholars in the field. Is this timely? Biased? Reliable? Then, from a subjective standpoint, discuss how this would help in a paper that is focused on your course topic. Does it fully address your topic? Is it focus on one aspect?
Source #2 full reference entry – entries should be in alphabetical order and have a hanging indent. I have formatted each one.
[Insert your annotation here]
Source #3 full reference entry – entries should be in alphabetical order and have a hanging indent. I have formatted each one.
[Insert your annotation here]
Source #4 full reference entry – entries should be in alphabetical order and have a hanging indent. I have formatted each one.
[Insert your annotation here]
Source #5 full reference entry – entries should be in alphabetical order and have a hanging indent. I have formatted each one.
[Insert your annotation here]

Juvenile Justice

Order Description

I need an AB on juvenile justice on five articles ; follow these directions:

Annotated Bibliography on [Juvenile Justice]
Source #1 full reference entry – entries should be in alphabetical order and have a hanging indent. I have formatted each one.
Begin your annotation immediately after the entry. Your annotation should be 2 paragraphs in length. The 1st paragraph should summarize the article. Remember the strategy that we practiced in class for scholarly sources – What did the author study, how did she study it and what did she learn?
Your second paragraph should assess the article – from both an objective and subjective perspective. Objectively, discuss its relevance or the author’s credentials when compared to scholars in the field. Is this timely? Biased? Reliable? Then, from a subjective standpoint, discuss how this would help in a paper that is focused on your course topic. Does it fully address your topic? Is it focus on one aspect?
Source #2 full reference entry – entries should be in alphabetical order and have a hanging indent. I have formatted each one.
[Insert your annotation here]
Source #3 full reference entry – entries should be in alphabetical order and have a hanging indent. I have formatted each one.
[Insert your annotation here]
Source #4 full reference entry – entries should be in alphabetical order and have a hanging indent. I have formatted each one.
[Insert your annotation here]
Source #5 full reference entry – entries should be in alphabetical order and have a hanging indent. I have formatted each one.
[Insert your annotation here]